Reviews

John Cage Diary: “Poetic and delightfully meandering”

Lee Ann Norman writes in ARTCRITICAL: “[Cage’s] critical, yet hopeful musings […] capture life’s impermanence as well as Cage’s personal comfort with ambiguity during a time when people around the world were desperately seeking certainty.”

Continue Reading »

Robert Seydel: Reading is always an intimate act

Matthew Erickson in THE BELIEVER: “[Seydel’s] work was the result of a private dialogue with a range of artists and writers, with influences echoing off of each other through his daily working cycle, the nights spent processing the texts ingested in the morning.”

Continue Reading »

John Cage Diary: “Questions more lucrative than their solution.”

Megan N. Liberty writes in THE BROOKLYN RAIL: “[Editors Biel and Kraft] revive Cage’s interest in chance methods and in effect reperform the journals, treating them as a score to interpret and collaborate with anew.”

Continue Reading »

Dorothy Iannone: “To give oneself and yet to remain free.”

Natalie Dunn writes in ENTROPY: “To fully realize its idiosyncrasies and moving portrayals of the quotidian, Iannone asks us to read and consider, to break into laughter, and to give in to moments of surprise.”

Continue Reading »

Here Comes Kitty: “No reason, but perhaps a rhyme”

Natalie Helberg writes in NUMÉRO CINQ: “Its intrigue is addictive. It is serene and cataclysmic. It is spiritual, yet sinister. It is all delinquent-joy and death-drive, and yet it is equally inexhaustible, incessantly generating”

Continue Reading »

Suite Vénitienne: “The parallel development of two selves”

David L. Ulin writes in THE LOS ANGELES TIMES: “The point is voyeurism…but it is also, and most essentially, an inquiry into the unbridgeable distances between us, the layers, the nuances, everything we cannot know.”

Continue Reading »